A woman in a public place reading messages on her phone

EventsChallenge 04 · Civic online safety

Safe in the Open

Reduce online harm to people in public life — and make the Seven Principles of Public Life visible in practice.

Apply for a place Eventbrite tickets — link coming soon
Oliver Cromwell's birthday
Apr 2027
of councillors reported abuse (LGA, 2025)
72%
public information only
Consent
Countdown
Sun 25 Apr 2027

01 — The problem

Protected in public, principled in the open

People in public life — councillors, governors, trustees and community volunteers — increasingly face online abuse and misinformation. It is a real threat to local democracy and falls hardest on those advocating for equity, mental health and young people. The public also rightly expects office-holders to uphold the Seven Principles of Public Life.

The public information needed to reduce that harm, and to evidence integrity, sits across public posts, published minutes, voting records, registers of interests and local news. No simple, responsible tool joins it up under a documented UK data-sharing standard.

01

Growing online abuse

72% of councillors reported abuse or intimidation in the past year; 64% said public online platforms were the main channel (LGA, 2025).

Why this is hard
72% REPORTED ABUSE OR INTIMIDATION 64% MAINLY VIA PUBLIC ONLINE PLATFORMS LGA, 2025

The figures on this card are the Local Government Association’s, published in 2025. The scale matters less here than the pattern it implies: what arrives is public, continuous, and comes through channels the person cannot simply switch off.

02

Integrity, but invisible

Conduct aligned to the Seven Principles is rarely visible to the public in a usable way.

Why this is hard
CONDUCT THAT MEETS THE STANDARD LEAVES ALMOST NO TRACE ! VISIBLE

The Seven Principles of Public Life set the standard expected of holders of public office. Conduct that meets them leaves very few visible traces, so the public record tends to carry the accusation and not the standard being kept.

03

Scattered public signals

Public posts, votes, declared interests and local news sit in different places, under different terms and licences.

Why this is hard
POSTSVOTES INTERESTSNEWS DIFFERENT PUBLISHER, DIFFERENT TERMS PUBLIC, BUT NOT TOGETHER

Everything relevant is already public — posts, votes, registers of interests, local reporting. Each sits with a different publisher under different terms and licences, so "public" does not mean available together.

02 — The question

How might a person in public life understand and act on the harm aimed at them, without having to read all of it themselves?

The question deliberately does not say what an answer looks like. A build, an analysis, a design or a shared standard can all answer it — see the four tracks.

Continuous volume arriving at one personMany arrows arrive continuously from the left at a single small box representing one person in public life. A bracket above the arrows marks that the volume does not stop. Below, a dashed route marked with a cross stands for reading and judging every item personally, which does not scale. WHAT ARRIVES CONTINUOUS, PUBLIC, AND NOT CHOSEN BY THE PERSON ONE PERSON IN PUBLIC LIFE WITH A DAY JOB READ AND JUDGE EVERY ITEM PERSONALLY THE VOLUME IS THE PROBLEM, NOT ANY SINGLE ITEM.
Fig. 1 — the difficulty is volume arriving continuously at one person, not any single item in it.

03 — The mission

An ethical, consented prototype — triage and self-assessment

Help a consenting adult volunteer in public life triage online abuse and misinformation aimed at them, and support self-assessment against the Seven Principles of Public Life. The pilot participant takes part in a personal capacity, not on behalf of any council.

What good looks like

  1. 1ProtectionDoes it measurably reduce harm?
  2. 2ClarityManageable for one busy volunteer?
  3. 3IntegrationJoins public sources lawfully and responsibly?
  4. 4Responsible useConsented, DPIA-backed, no over-reach?
  5. 5FeasibilityCould a small community group run it?

Five criteria, equal weight.

04 — The data

The public data and framework you will use

Data sharing follows the ICO Data Sharing Code of Practice — the statutory code under s.121 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

DatasetWhat it isLicence
Seven Principles of Public LifeThe framework for self-assessment — not an automated integrity score.Public
Minutes, votes and interestsPublished council decisions, attendance and registers of members’ interests.Public record
Local news and public postsPublic posts aimed at the consenting participant, via official APIs.Consent + terms
Open abuse / toxicity modelsOpen models flag abuse, threats and misinformation for human triage only.Open source
Support and reporting routesRoutes to platform reporting, the police and welfare support.Safeguarding

Open data repository on GitHub (opens external site) No account needed to browse

Take part in 04

Sunday 25 April 2027. 100 places, free to enter, open to all ages — some ages may need parental consent. Bring a team or form one on the day — no prior coding needed.